Whilst we have ensured that the council have put several counter-measures in to improve the situation (more bins, more patrols in certain areas and increased cleaning), the situation is one that is ongoing. Despite the actions above, people continue to let their dogs foul and drop litter.
The ideal actions will lead to people being caught, hence fined but it is not always easy to catch people in the act. The next step is to put measures in that shame those who foul and litter and make it socially unacceptable, which is a far more discreet but effective way to approach than has been done in some places.
Although the problem is ward wide (indeed district wide and country wide), there is one particular area of concern and this is around the schools on Pennine Way. Dog fouling in any place is bad but to allow dogs to foul in an environment where there are a large number of young children and babies is unacceptable.
We have communicated issues from the school to the wardens and have tried to engage the public for more information as to when the incidents are happening, though success has been limited.
In order to improve the situation, we have worked with our fellow councillors in the Swadlincote Ward (as the school is on the border of the 2 wards) and engaged with council officers.
On a recent afternoon Councillor Mick Mulgrew, head warden Gareth Evans, Environmental Health Manager Matt Holford and I monitored the area around the school during afternoon school run and discussed the issues with several people around the area including the headmistress of the infant school.
Below is a summary of what was discussed:
• There were a few bins that were overfull and also places where the siting of a new bin would have been ideal. This was mainly on the footpath from Glebe Street through to the schools. Action – bin provision to be looked into as well as frequency of collections.
• Several anti fouling and littering signs were worn and some area were short on signs (although contrary to some opinion, it is not a legal requirement to have signs up in order to prosecute for dog fouling or littering). The use of alternative signs was also discussed, though the use of shocking images signs is not felt appropriate given the surroundings. Action – signs and stencils to be replaced where necessary.
• The infant school had produced some posters to highlight the issue but these have not yet been displayed. Action – print the posters and display appropriately.
• Add to the intelligence gained to find out if there are any known persistent offenders. Action – wardens to patrol and engage with dog walkers and hand out poop scoop bags.
• Some of the intelligence given suggested that people may be letting dogs off the lead to foul in an evening. Action: look to impose a “dogs on lead” control order on the area, therefore action can be immediately taken on any dog not on a lead. This would need to be approved by the EDS committee and would not be an immediate action.
• We also discussed the work done by other councils to implement a good dog walker scheme and are considering a pilot scheme if the results elsewhere were successful.
Overall, we need to ensure that the actions lead to not only improvement but a sustainable improvement.

